DoorDash and Uber Eats Commission vs Owning Your Content

DoorDash charges US restaurants 15%, 25% or 30% of each delivery order on its Basic, Plus and Premier plans, and 6% on pickup (DoorDash). Uber Eats charges 20%, 25% or 30% on Lite, Plus and Premium, and 7% on pickup (Uber Eats). Any ads sit on top.

Most owners I know can tell you their DoorDash ad spend to the dollar, but couldn't tell you the last time they posted to their own feed. That isn't a failure of effort. It's just where the money quietly goes. The problem is what you're left with when you stop paying.

Below: the commission on every US plan, checked October 2026 on each platform's own merchant pricing page, a $30 order worked through, and then the part the commission table doesn't show.

up to $100: DoorDash Sponsored Listings new-store ad credit (part of up to $200 in marketing credits), pay-per-order second-price auction

$25 million: Uber Eats marketing credits offered to US restaurants at the Sponsored Listings launch, August 2020

£0.25/click; £5.8-10.2 per £1: Deliveroo Marketer Adverts (UK) starting CPC and average campaign return, Oct-Dec 2023

DoorDash, Uber Eats and Grubhub commission rates in the US

Checked October 2026 on each platform's own merchant pricing page. Percentages are of the order subtotal.

Sources: DoorDash merchant pricing, Uber Eats merchant pricing, Grubhub's pricing guide.

A few things the table hides:

• DoorDash says its commission covers listing, marketing, Dasher logistics and customer support, with "no activation fee, no subscription fee, no payment processing fee." Pickup at 6% requires your pickup menu prices to match in-store prices (DoorDash).
• Uber Eats pickup is 7% only if you prove app prices match in-store prices; otherwise it is 10%. Its New York City Lite plan adds a 3% card processing fee (Uber Eats).
• Grubhub is the hard one to pin down. Its own pricing guide lists marketing fees "as low as" 5% (Basic), 10% (Plus) and 15% (Premium), a 10% fee when its drivers deliver, and a standard processing fee of "3.05%, plus 30 cents per prepaid transaction". A Duck-Hub review updated October 2026 reads Grubhub's current pricing page as 5%, 15% and 20% (Basic, Plus, All-Access). We could not read the tier table on that page ourselves, so the table shows the range. Grubhub also describes its packages as flexible, so ask for your own quote.

What a $30 delivery order actually pays

The same $30 subtotal on each plan, before tax, tips, promotions or ads. Grubhub assumes its own drivers deliver.

The Grubhub processing fee works out at $1.215, shown rounded to $1.22. Grubhub charges it on the prepaid transaction, which usually includes tax, so the real figure runs a little higher. On a Premier or Premium plan, almost a third of every delivery ticket goes to the app before you pay for food, labour or packaging. Pickup costs a fraction of that, which is why it is worth pushing.

Is DoorDash worth it for restaurants?

Often, yes, for orders you would not otherwise get. The honest test is margin, not volume. If your food and packaging cost leaves less than about 30% of the ticket, a 30% plan sells at a loss on every order, and Basic at 15% or pickup at 6% is the plan to start on. The cheapest move is to price delivery menus with the commission in mind and send repeat customers to pickup or your own ordering. DoorDash's own Online Ordering, for example, carries no commission, only a payment processing fee (DoorDash).

That covers what the apps take from each order. The rest of this piece is about what you pay on top to be seen, and what you keep when you stop.

Where the budget really goes

Walk into most independent restaurants and the marketing budget has one destination: sponsored placement inside the delivery apps. It makes sense. That's where the orders come from, so that's where the money follows. But it's worth naming what's actually happening. You pay the platform a commission on every delivery order, and then you pay again to be seen inside the same app. The ad spend sits on top of the commission, not instead of it. Fair is fair: for pure delivery volume, in-app ads can genuinely work. The real question is whether they're the whole plan or just one line of it.

How DoorDash and Uber Eats actually charge you

The two big apps charge differently, and the difference matters. DoorDash Sponsored Listings is pay-per-order: you set a bid and a budget, and per DoorDash's own merchant help pages it runs a second-price auction, so if you win you pay the second-highest bid, and only when an order actually lands within seven days of the click. New stores can get up to $100 in ad credits (part of up to $200 in marketing credits). Uber Eats runs on cost-per-click instead: you set a weekly budget and pay each time someone taps your listing, order or not. When it launched the ads in August 2020, Uber put up $25 million in marketing credits to get US restaurants trying them, per its own newsroom. Both models can spend efficiently. Both also stop the instant you stop paying.

What in-app ads actually buy you

Here's the part the dashboards don't show. When a delivery-app ad works, it works inside the app. The customer found you in a ranked list next to your competitors, ordered, and moved on. You don't get their email, you don't get a follower, you don't get a photo you can reuse. You rented attention for one transaction. Even good returns are still rented ones: in the UK, where Deliveroo publishes figures, its Marketer Adverts start at £0.25 a click and the platform reports average campaigns returned £5.8 to £10.2 per £1 spent between October and December 2023. Strong numbers. But turn the ads off and the visibility leaves with them, because none of it was ever yours.

Owned vs rented: what compounds and what resets

Owned content is the opposite trade. A reel on your own Instagram, a carousel on your Google Business profile, a post in your voice: those keep working after the spend stops, and they build on each other. A year of delivery-app ads leaves you with a year of invoices. A year of owned posts leaves you with a library, an audience, and a brand people recognise before they open any app.

Neither is free, and neither is a silver bullet. The point is that one compounds and one resets to zero every billing cycle.

The structural difference: owned content from your own photos

The reason owners neglect their own channels isn't laziness, it's that owned content is genuinely more work than clicking 'boost'. That's the gap Synthopia closes. It builds the reels, stills, carousels, and copy from your own product and ambience photos, in your voice, so what goes out is real to your venue and not stock app inventory. In Miami that means tying posts to what's actually on: a Miami Spice menu, a weekend rush, a new dish, rather than a generic listing thumbnail. You're not choosing between paying the platform forever and posting nothing. You get owned content without the studio time it normally demands.

A balanced split, not a switch

So don't torch the delivery ads. If DoorDash or Uber Eats moves real orders for you, keep the campaigns that pay back and cut the ones that don't, the same discipline you'd apply to any ad channel. Just stop letting them be the entire plan. A sensible split: fund the in-app ads that earn their keep for delivery volume, and put a steady stream of owned content on your own feeds so you're building something that survives the next budget review. The delivery apps rent you customers by the click. Your own channels are the only place you actually get to keep them.